Outgrowing the Relationship Script

On building a full life—and raising the bar for what love has to add

This is written through the lens of heterosexual dating and relationships. It’s not meant to be universal—just honest about my experience and the patterns I’ve observed.

---

I went on a date a few months ago where he asked me what my biggest red flag was. I told him it might be that I’m too happy alone. At the time, I said it lightly, half-joking. But the truth is, that feeling is something I’ve slowly grown into.

I remember going to family events as a teenager and the first questions out of certain relatives’ mouths were: “Are you dating anyone? Do you have a boyfriend?” As if there was nothing else interesting going on in my life, no other achievements worthy of discussing.

These questions were part of something bigger: a reinforcement that romantic partnership was the central thing everything else revolved around. School, friends, work, travel—meaningful, yes—but often framed as what fills time until you find your person. Until your life actually begins.

You see it everywhere. In books and movies where the story resolves the moment two people choose each other, as if that’s the final destination. In the way that, as you stay single, you watch your friends pair off, and get gently reassured that “your time will come.” In the way weddings have become these multi-day, multi-event productions—all centred around the idea that it’s the defining milestone of our lives.

It even shows up in the way we measure progress. “Settling down” is treated as moving forward and is synonymous with calmness and stability, while staying single is framed as a temporary and slightly chaotic phase to go through while you wait to become part of a pair.

The message is subtle, but constant: love is the main storyline. Everything else is filler.

I used to buy into that story completely. Ask any of my close friends and they’ll tell you that in my teens and early twenties, my goal was to be married with at least one kid by 28. I imagined myself as a young, cool wife and mom.

Beyond the fact that that vision hasn’t come to fruition—I’m 30, single, and childless—that larger narrative doesn’t resonate the way it once did. Not because I’ve stopped believing in love, but because I’ve started questioning the version of it I was handed.

Now, I sometimes find myself worrying that I may never actually want to choose anyone.

A big part of that is because my life is already full. Any potential partner isn’t competing with other men—he’s competing with me, with the peace and happiness I already have. I have routines I love, a sense of self I’ve worked hard to build, and a community that emotionally nourishes me in a real, consistent way.

That fundamentally changes the standard.

A relationship is no longer something that automatically adds value. It has to prove that it does. It has to bring something meaningful into my life—not just presence or attention, not just the idea of partnership—but something that actually expands it.

I’m not looking for a lightning bolt or fireworks, but the day-to-day sense that things feel easier, lighter, more supported with the right person. I want to know that I don’t have to carry everything on my own, and I don’t have to give up parts of myself to make it work. That responsibility—emotional, logistical, everything in between—is shared, not assumed. That I’m not managing the relationship, but actually in it.

I’m not interested in settling for anything less than that.

Photo from Pinterest

And this isn’t just about me—it reflects something broader. Women today are more financially and emotionally independent than ever before. Most of us have careers, social lives, and identities outside of partnership.

It’s easy to forget how recent this shift is.

Just 50-60 years ago, women couldn’t even open their own bank account or access credit without a husband or male co-signer. Living independently was often frowned upon. When they did work, they were typically funnelled into lower-paying jobs with limited opportunities for advancement. Many could get fired for getting pregnant or were expected to leave the workforce after marriage. On top of that, being unmarried past a certain age came with its own stigma—the implication that you were a spinster, a failure, somehow unwanted.

Women didn’t just get married because they wanted love. Marriage was the most reliable way to access long-term economic stability, social legitimacy, and a full adult life. It was, in many ways, survival.

So of course women partnered, and many did everything they could to demonstrate their ability to make their husbands’ lives easier—to be the “right” kind of wife, mother, and homemaker. And many stayed in relationships that weren’t quite right, because the alternative wasn’t independence—it was limitation.

That doesn’t mean those relationships were empty or unloving, but they existed within a system that didn’t offer the same freedom we have now.

Today, the conditions that once made men structurally necessary have, for many women, significantly eroded or disappeared entirely. Access to income. Legal autonomy. Social mobility. The freedom to pursue and prioritize your career. The ability to have children, live alone, build something on your own terms.

Women used to need men to build a life. Now, many of us build a life first—and then ask ourselves different questions: “Does partnership actually make this better? Does this person meaningfully improve something that already works?”

Once you start asking these questions, it becomes very hard to un-ask them.

While our lives have changed and expanded, the scripts we’ve inherited haven’t kept up. In many ways, dating culture still operates on outdated assumptions that position men as the ones with optionality. As women, we’re told to be easygoing, to not ask for too much, and to play it cool so as to not “scare them off.” We still behave as if men are the scarce resource, as if they’re the ones who’ll offer us access to a better life.

But that framing doesn’t make sense anymore. Because statistically—and practically—women are bringing more to the table than they ever have before.

Research consistently shows that men tend to benefit more from relationships than women do. When married, they experience better physical health, lower rates of depression, higher earnings (known as the marital wage premium), greater happiness, and longer lifespans.

The contrast becomes even clearer in the absence of a partner. Widowed men, for example, are more likely to experience sharp declines in health and well-being after losing a spouse—and face a higher risk of dying themselves. Unmarried, divorced, or widowed men also face higher rates of loneliness, depression, and social isolation, and are more likely to die by suicide. Part of the reason may be that for many men, a romantic partner isn’t just one source of connection—it’s often the primary one, and sometimes the only consistent place where emotional needs are met.

On the flip side, the data around women is less straightforward. Certain studies show that married women report lower levels of loneliness, and that those with children, in particular, report higher levels of happiness than unmarried ones. Others also suggest that marriage can have positive effects on women’s mental and physical health.

But other data points in a different direction. Some research shows that single women tend to be healthier, less depressed, and live longer than their married counterparts. One study even found that while divorce can have a negative financial impact on women, they still report greater happiness and life satisfaction for up to five years following the end of their marriage—often higher than what they experienced, on average, throughout their lives.

That shift may be linked to relief from unhappy dynamics and a renewed sense of autonomy and self-confidence. It may also reflect a redistribution of responsibility. In many relationships, women still carry the brunt of unpaid labour—household chores, emotional management, and childcare (when applicable)—leaving less time, energy, and space for themselves.

So while partnership can absolutely be fulfilling, it doesn’t seem to be as inherently or universally beneficial for women—at least not without intention, balance, and reciprocity.

What does show up again and again as essential to women’s health and happiness isn’t romantic partnership, but connection and social support—especially with other women. Long-term studies on well-being point to meaningful relationships as the biggest driver of a good life, and some research even suggests that spending time with female friends can counteract stress.

Women also have broader, more consistent support systems—with key relationships spread across friendships, family, and community—so they aren’t relying on a single person to meet every emotional need in the same way men often do.

Despite everything above, what’s interesting is that women are still more likely to be exclusively seeking committed relationships. About 36% of women say they want one, compared to just 22% of men. And when you zoom in on straight singles between 30 and 39, that gap gets even wider—49% of women versus 23% of men. That’s more than double (!!!).

If relationships tend to benefit men more, why are they the ones dodging commitment? And if women are already supported, connected, and fulfilled on their own, why are we still the ones seeking relationships and bending over backwards to make them work?

To be fair, I don’t think this tension is one-sided. As women’s lives have expanded, men are navigating a shifting landscape that doesn’t come with a clear blueprint. The roles they were taught to step into don’t map as cleanly into the relationships many women want now. What we expect emotionally and relationally is different from what it used to be, and this disconnect can show up as confusion, resistance, or a mismatch in expectations.

On the more extreme end, it also shows up in the rise of hyper-traditional relationship ideals, in the popularity of “trad wife” content, and in conversations about gender roles that feel like they’re moving backward instead of forward.

Everything I’ve written about in this article—structural, cultural, statistical—doesn’t just exist in theory. It shows up in smaller, more personal ways.

I feel the tension in my own life. I meet men who are kind, interesting, even compatible in a lot of ways—but something doesn’t fully land. Nothing you can point to as a clear dealbreaker, just the sense that the dynamic would require me to shrink in ways I’m no longer willing to, or stretch in ways that don’t feel reciprocal.

That’s enough for me to pause.

Which is where things start to clash with my least favourite piece of advice: that I should be less picky, that I should lower my standards. But I don’t think my standards are the problem. If anything, they’re reflective of the life I’ve built. And if the reality is that men benefit more from relationships than women do, then it makes even less sense for me to compromise the most.

I deserve to be picky. I have the right to be thoughtful about who I choose.

I’m also self-aware enough to realize that some of this is likely self-protective. Yes, I’ve intentionally built a full, beautiful life—but have I made it so complete that no one can disrupt it? Is it easier to say no than to risk choosing something imperfect? Am I protecting myself from having to make the harder, messier choice of letting someone in? That’s a layer I’m still unpacking.

And then there’s what complicates everything: I still want kids, although the path to that life no longer feels as fixed as it once did. I’m more open to different timelines, different structures, even the idea of doing it alone. The dream hasn’t disappeared; it’s just no longer tied to the idea that it has to happen within a traditional partnership.

But being open to that hasn’t taken away my desire for love—and maybe that’s the part that’s hardest to explain.

As happy as I am alone, I still love love. I cry at every wedding. It makes me genuinely happy to be around couples who are just right for each other. I still believe in choosing someone and being chosen back. I still want partnership, intimacy, to build something with someone.

However, I no longer believe that love is inevitable, or owed, or guaranteed to make my life better just by existing.

I don’t need a relationship to have a full life. I already have one.

But I still hope to find a kind of love that meets my life where it is—and feels worth rearranging it for.

B

---

---